Best TV for Gaming in 2025

With 2025’s S90F, Samsung has yet brought unneurotic the champion aspects of high-end televisions and the fastest PC gaming displays into 1 end-game package. It was adjacent past twelvemonth with the S90D (which was besides a precise bully gaming TV), but the improvements Samsung has made to fullscreen brightness and HDR highlights propulsion the S90F to the apical tier of our recommendations, and marque gaming connected the S90F a fantastic experience, present viable adjacent if you’re not surviving successful a cave. Just marque definite to get the 65-inch version, which uses Samsung's QD-OLED technology; different sizes usage an inferior WOLED panel.

Gaming connected the S90F is arsenic bully arsenic oregon amended than astir PC monitors. With a 144Hz refresh complaint and afloat VRR support, gaming is clear, fluid, and judder-free nary substance if you’re playing astatine 60 fps oregon 120 oregon anyplace successful between. As I noted successful my review, playing Doom: The Dark Ages connected the S90F, with near-instant pixel effect times and incredibly debased input lag, was an implicit treat. TestUFO pursuit shots (at a precise accelerated 1,920 pixels/sec) backmost this up, showing lone axenic sample-and-hold blur without immoderate smearing oregon trailing. And happily, Samsung's Game mode doesn't compromise the representation quality, truthful HDR EOTF tracking and calibration are inactive top-notch.

Speaking of the EOTF, connected a 2% achromatic slide, typical of a emblematic HDR highlight, my measurements corroborate that the S90F tracks HDR people luminance astir perfectly, with lone a flimsy deviation successful the darkest shades, beneath 1 nit. Samsung is simply a spot much blimpish with brightness successful crippled mode than successful its movie modes, but highest brightness inactive reaches astir 1,200 nits connected existent contented – inactive incredibly punchy, particularly with OLED’s utmost section contrast.

The S90F does astir arsenic good connected a 10% slide, meaning that Samsung tin support precise bully output implicit a decent information of the screen. But brightness falls arsenic the model size increases: At 100% fullscreen white, the S90F tin lone eek retired 250 nits, excessively dim for agleam country gaming.

LCD competitors similar the Hisense U8QG oregon TCL QM8K tin pip the S90F successful implicit luminance output, but their effect times are simply excessively dilatory to support up, and their viewing angles are overmuch worse than OLED. For gamers who person the quality to power the lighting successful their rooms, the S90F OLED means there’s nary going backmost to LCD.

At launch, the S90F's $2,500 asking terms was excessively high, but patience (and steadfast competition) pays: The S90F tin present beryllium recovered for $1,500, and astatine that price, it's an casual triumph for gamers.

Because of its tremendous performance/cost ratio, Samsung’s S90F earns our apical spot for champion wide gaming TV, but for those that person the further fund to outpouring for a flagship product, some Samsung and LG are offering 2025 models (the S95F and G5) that propulsion SDR/HDR brightness to caller levels, amended reflection handling, and connection higher refresh rates. With end-of-year sales, they negociate this without the luxury tax/diminishing returns terms hike that usually comes with halo products.

In fact, a lawsuit could beryllium made that LG, successful particular, is tilting worth towards the precocious end: Fullscreen brightness, a large country of weakness for erstwhile gen and little tier OLEDs, has been ramped astir 80%, but the terms premium for implicit the tier-down C5 is lone astir 40%. Case successful point: The C5 gets you 220 nits fullscreen. The G5 gets you astir 400.

We loved the 2,000+ nit highlights successful our review, which we see indispensable astatine this terms tier, but LG has done a large occupation of balancing these with the drastically improved 100% APL, a immense year-on-year betterment implicit the G4 (one of our favorites from past year). This brightness boost besides comes with an betterment to colour purity arsenic well; we measured 91.5% of the DCI-P3 colour space, an fantabulous effect for a WOLED panel. While LG is being tight-lipped astir however precisely they achieved this, Panasonic's announcement of their Z95B, utilizing the aforesaid sheet arsenic the G5, revealed the tech arsenic Primary RGB Tandem, which allows the G5 to inch person to Samsung's RGB QD-OLED performance.

Picture prime is everything we've travel to expect from OLED panels: cleanable blacks, unthinkable opposition that adjacent multi-thousand portion FALD backlights can't execute without blooming, and spectacular off-angle viewing. And this show extends to LG's "Game Optimizer" mode arsenic well: instant effect times, autochthonal 165Hz refresh complaint with VRR, debased latency with ALLM, positive a ton of utile options for tweaking shadiness and item balance. For gaming, adjacent successful fast-paced shooters similar Apex Legends, the G5 is arsenic bully arsenic it gets.

For downsides, our biggest contented with the G5 didn't person thing to bash with its representation quality; the occupation is LG's WebOS. Cluttered, slow, and hard to navigate, LG's UI seems to beryllium regressing from erstwhile years, spurred connected by their request to AI-ify everything. We've adjacent mislaid the input enactment fastener connected the distant successful favour of an AI button, a determination which is baffling.

But if you tin get past the clunky menus (which is thing unluckily shared by Samsung arsenic well), the G5 is the top-tier gaming TV of 2025. Whether you’re playing games oregon watching movies, SDR oregon HDR, basement cave oregon agleam surviving room, the G5 delivers an awesome experience.

Why the G5 implicit the S95F? The LG is $300 cheaper and some execute astir the same. Save the currency and enjoy.

The prime successful this class was a very, precise adjacent contention betwixt 2 LCD sets: TCL’s QM8K and the Hisense U8QG. We were hugely impressed with some the TCL and the Hisense, and it seems that the 2 companies are successful lock-step, some pushing the bound of what’s imaginable with FALD backlit LCD technology. We’re present getting much and much dimming zones, absurd brightness, and ever-increasing refresh rates. But for the champion agleam country gaming experience, we urge the Hisense U8QG.

While the U8QG can deed 4,000 nits successful highly circumstantial cases, a better, much realistic metric for showcasing its brightness show is to look astatine wherever its EOTF curve tops retired with a 2% model size compared with 100% fullscreen white. The U8QG tin scope much than 1,300 nits for highlights, but impressively, its fullscreen luminance lone drops to 780 nits, which is inactive massively bright. That capableness to present mega fullscreen nits combined with an fantabulous AR coating means that the U8QG is simply a genuinely awesome agleam country performer.

An OLED, similar our apical prime – the Samsung S90F – tin spell toe-to-toe with the U8QG astatine a 2% model size, but it takes a monolithic deed for fullscreen white, down to 250 nits, little than a 3rd of what the Hisense tin do.

Color show stays fantabulous arsenic good – bright, deep, vivid, and astir afloat sum of the DCI-P3 colour abstraction – enabled by the U8QG’s quantum dot enhanced backlight. Just don’t get excessively acold disconnected halfway oregon the viewing acquisition starts to suffer. TCL’s QM8K is akin successful this regard, but it has less backlight zones, is somewhat dimmer, and doesn’t person the aforesaid prime anti-reflective coating, which is wherefore our motion goes to the U8QG.

Gaming/motion show connected the U8QG is bully but not stellar. It supports 165Hz (+VRR) astatine 4K solution connected each its HDMI ports, and it adjacent has an enhanced 288Hz mode astatine QHD for PC gamers, but its pixel effect times aren’t successful league with OLEDs oregon IPS gaming monitors. My effect clip measurements carnivore this out: an mean of 20ms, but with immoderate transitions lingering for astir 30. Pursuit shots of the TestUFO alien springiness an close ocular of what you tin expect; objects person excessively overmuch blur and acheronian colors amusement important trailing.

While the Hisense U8QG doesn’t lucifer OLED competitors similar the Samsung S90F oregon LG C5 for question clarity oregon viewing angles, its large fullscreen brightness and effectual AR coating marque it a sensible prime and the existent go-to LCD to bushed for gaming successful agleam rooms.

This class sees different precise adjacent contention betwixt the 2 mid-range titans: the TCL QM7K and the Hisense U75QG. You truly can’t spell incorrect with either; some connection afloat array section dimming, quantum dot backlights (or KSF phosphors successful the lawsuit of the U75QG) for large DCI-P3 colour abstraction coverage, and 144Hz+ precocious refresh rates with VRR for gaming. But due to the fact that TCL tuned its HVA sheet to the as-good-as-it-gets level for LCD, the QM7K tops our database for champion mid-range gaming TV.

The Hisense tin get importantly brighter, has much dimming zones, and is the amended prime for movies and television, but it’s fto down by its question performance. While the U75QG boasts a somewhat higher max refresh complaint of 165Hz, its effect times simply aren’t bully capable to bushed the 144Hz mode connected the TCL, which is fantabulous for some console and PC gaming.

But successful our review, we weren’t conscionable impressed with the gaming performance: TCL has done an fantabulous occupation reducing blooming and haloing with its section dimming algorithm, and with enactment for some HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, the QM7K volition enactment with immoderate content, whether that’s streaming movies oregon the latest HDR games.

If you privation the champion gaming TV nether $1,000, the QM7K is the logical choice.

All candidates for our champion fund gaming TV grant had to conscionable 3 circumstantial requirements:

1. Full array section dimming
2. Quantum dot oregon different enhanced backlight
3. 120Hz + refresh complaint with Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) support

There are a batch of decent televisions retired determination that conscionable immoderate of these criteria, but we contend that, successful 2025, large HDR gaming requires each three. Edge-lit TVs can’t amusement the stark section opposition that makes HDR contented pop, and they endure from superior blooming, particularly off-angle. Standard LED backlights besides autumn good abbreviated of covering the DCI-P3 colour space, leaving colors dull and lifeless. And with modern gaming consoles afloat supporting 120Hz “performance” modes with VRR, a fixed 60Hz refresh complaint means the gaming acquisition is tarnished with the tearing and judder associated with emblematic V-Sync behavior.

In our review, we were precise impressed with the QM6K. That sentiment inactive stands, making the QM6K our definitive prime for champion fund gaming TV. Especially awesome was its quality to grip HDR highlights without important blooming oregon haloing, fixed its constricted portion count. Color show is besides excellent, helped by the KSF phosphor successful its backlight. For watching movies and playing games, we besides recovered off-angle viewing to beryllium great, with constricted nonaccomplishment of opposition and colour saturation adjacent good off-center.

TCL besides has a knack for finely tuning the effect clip show of their HVA panels: The QM6K has fantabulous effect times and presents a creaseless and judder-free gaming acquisition astatine immoderate framerate acknowledgment to its 144Hz max refresh complaint and enactment for VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, and ALLM. Two full-speed HDMI 2.1 ports let simultaneous connections for some PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S consoles, leaving the different HDMI ports disposable for little refresh complaint devices.

Below $650, though, concessions person to beryllium made. Fullscreen brightness isn’t peculiarly good. This is not a TV that volition “wow” you with agleam highlights. This isn’t helped by TCL’s determination to usage a glossy surface coating with nary existent anti-reflective treatment. If your superior viewing situation is brightly lit, the QM6K mightiness not springiness the popular you’re looking for. We besides recovered the Google TV interface dilatory and laggy.

Still, TCL has someway delivered a precise respectable performer with the QM6K, making it our apical prime for champion fund gaming TV.

Originally posted:

Nov 24, 2025 11:05 pm