WGMI vs. HODL: Same Crypto, Wildly Different Results

2 hours ago 2
  • WGMI has dramatically outperformed HODL implicit the past twelvemonth but comes with a higher disbursal ratio and adjacent steeper volatility.

  • HODL straight tracks Bitcoin's price, portion WGMI invests successful companies tied to Bitcoin mining and infrastructure.

  • WGMI's portfolio is much diversified, portion HODL is simply a pure-play connected the cryptocurrency itself.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the adjacent question of millionaires ›

Prediction Market powered by

VanEck Bitcoin ETF (NYSEMKT:HODL) and CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (NASDAQ:WGMI) some pat into Bitcoin's growth, but HODL offers nonstop vulnerability to the cryptocurrency portion WGMI targets the broader Bitcoin mining ecosystem, with notable differences successful cost, hazard profile, and diversification.

Both funds entreaty to investors funny successful the Bitcoin space, but their approaches diverge: HODL is simply a single-asset money physically backed by Bitcoin, aiming to reflector its price, portion WGMI holds a handbasket of companies generating gross from Bitcoin mining oregon related services. This investigation compares their structure, performance, cost, and hazard to assistance clarify which whitethorn acceptable antithetic hazard appetites oregon concern goals.

Metric

HODL

WGMI

Issuer

VanEck

CoinShares

Expense ratio

0.20%

0.75%

1-yr instrumentality (as of 2026-01-09)

(15.1%)

84.0%

Beta

N/A

6.01

AUM

$1.4 billion

$355.7 million

Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.

WGMI charges a higher interest than HODL, making the second much affordable for semipermanent holders. Yield information are not disposable for either fund, truthful payout is not a differentiator successful this comparison.

WGMI focuses connected companies astatine the intersection of fiscal services and technology, with 81% of assets successful financials, 18% successful tech, and 1% successful utilities. Its portfolio holds 24 names, led by IREN (NASDAQ:IREN), Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR), and Hut 8 (NASDAQ:HUT) and the money has a 3.9-year way record. It does not put straight successful Bitcoin, but alternatively successful the infrastructure and work providers that enactment the mining industry.

HODL, by contrast, is simply a pure-play conveyance holding lone Bitcoin, with nary assemblage diversification oregon vulnerability to operating companies. This makes it highly delicate to Bitcoin's terms movements, with a assemblage breakdown not reported and 100% of assets allocated to Bitcoin. Neither ETF features leverage, derivatives, oregon different structural quirks.

For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.

Cryptocurrency ETFs similar these are comparatively caller concern vehicles, and travel with utmost volatility that investors request to recognize earlier buying. Unlike accepted ETFs, crypto investments tin acquisition melodramatic terms swings tied to Bitcoin's movements, and Bitcoin mining stocks similar those held successful WGMI often amplify those swings adjacent further.

Read Entire Article